Am 08.12.2011 11:18, schrieb Gert Doering:
Hi,
The best choice? Don't use 6148-GE-TX modules. They are fundamentally
broken (8 ports share one ASIC with a single-GE uplink, one port that's
"full" will block out the other 7 ports, ...). It's even worse if
I've heard that now multiple times, but a # sh int cap says:
Switch-1#sh int cap mod 5 | i ASIC
Ports on ASIC: 1-24
Ports on ASIC: 1-24
[..]
So does that mean, that even 24 ports share 1x Gigabit? As I said: a
fully utilized port 14 had a negative side-effect on more or less all
ports on the blade but certainly on port #4. My understanding is, that
this should not be the case if the ports 1-8, 9-16 and so on build a group.
Does it make sense to replace the 6148-GE-TX with a 6748 or is the sup2
respectively the sup32 the actual bottleneck?
67xx won't work with the sup32 (thanks, cisco). I'd go for 6516-GE-TX,
which have a much saner architecture than the 6148-GE-TX *and* will
work with non-fabric-enabled supervisors.
What about 6148A-GE-TX or 6548-GE-TX? Will one of those modules help me
to solve this issue or at least make it less worse?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
