On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 14:14 +0000, Aled Morris wrote: > On 5 January 2012 13:54, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote: > > it beggars belief that vendors are still shipping non DOM-enabled > > transceivers. There may have been good reasons for this 10 years ago, but > > not in 2012. > > It's the reason Cisco keep their optic module prices so low.
You're joking, right? Even the "GLC" modules are in my experience 2-5 times more expensive than respectable third party modules, and 5-10 times more expensive than "no name" modules. And the 3rd pary modules almost always support DOM. :-) -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
