Yes I saw that feature, but I need the gig ports. I did find a log entry stating there was a QOS mismatch between the channel ports. Since I have the "no mls channel-consistency" command in the channel config , that would imply it is not working on the sup 10G ports. I did see that all the sup ports are on the same ASIC, maybe that is stopping the consistency check from working.
Jeff On Jan 5, 2012, at 15:26 , <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a "10g-only mode" for the supervisor ports on the Sup720-10GE. > > mls qos 10g-only > > This mode disables the 1Gb/s ports, and enables 8q4t ingress and 1p7q4t > egress queueing on the 10Gb/s ports, which is the same as the ports on the > 6708 card. > > If queueing is the only failed consistency parameter, then enabling this mode > might allow the EtherChannel to come up without disabling the consistency > check. > > I haven't tried it. > > /chris > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of David Prall >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:28 PM >> To: 'Chuck Church'; 'Jeffrey G. Fitzwater' >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ? >> >> Is QoS configured? Have to configure qos inconsistency, "no mls qos channel- >> consistency" >> >> David >> >> -- >> http://dcp.dcptech.com >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Church >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:13 PM >> To: 'Jeffrey G. Fitzwater' >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ? >> >> Show int capability might shed some light on what the interface differences >> are. >> >> Chuck >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey G. Fitzwater >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:55 AM >> To: Andrew Miehs >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ? >> >> I really have to understand why the 16A channel gets built. >> >> All the trunking and port configs are correct. If they were wrong the logs >> "should" show me what was broke. Santa checked his list twice, I did it 10 >> times. >> >> >> I do have the same config working, using a sup 10g port on another router as >> a >> channel member, but it connects to nexus 7018. >> In the broken case, both ends use a sup10g port and another X6708 port, but >> they are not paired to same type at other end (sup-10g to sup-10g) vs >> (sup-10g >> to X6708-10g ) not that it should matter. >> >> So the only unique thing, is both ends are sup-720-10g in the broken case. >> Its not the LACP proto since I tried MODE ON with same problem. >> What is also odd is when I disable one port of the channel, and do the "show >> ether channel 16 summ", only the 16 is present with both port (one DOWN). >> the 16A is gone. >> As soon was I enable the other port the 16A shows up. >> >> Whats odd is there is nothing in the log telling why the channel did not >> come up >> correctly instead of this 16 and 16A . >> >> Could it have something to do with using both 10G ports on the same sup, but >> for different functions? One is for this channel the other is just an access >> port. >> >> Jeff >> >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:48 , Andrew Miehs wrote: >> >> Hi Jeff, >> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I am trying to use the sup720-10G 10g port and another 10g port on a >> 6708-10G >> module as an ether-channel pair. >> >> ... >> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports >> ------+-------------+-----------+--------------------------------------- >> ------+-------------+-----------+---- >> ---- >> 16 Po16(SU) LACP Te13/1(P) >> 16 Po16A(SU) LACP Te7/4(P) >> >> ----------------------------------- >> >> I do not see this issue on a SXI5 box - see below. >> >> You may want to try: >> >> default interface Te13/1 >> default interface Te7/4 >> >> no inter port16 >> no inter port16a >> >> interface Te13/1 >> channel-group 16 mode passive >> interface Te7/4 >> channel-group 16 mode passive >> >> - and then see what "show etherchannel summary" outputs... >> >> >> ==== example config >> >> gv(config-if)#do show etherch summary >> Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel >> I - stand-alone s - suspended >> H - Hot-standby (LACP only) >> R - Layer3 S - Layer2 >> U - in use N - not in use, no aggregation >> f - failed to allocate aggregator >> >> M - not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links not met >> m - not in use, port not aggregated due to minimum links not met >> u - unsuitable for bundling >> d - default port >> >> w - waiting to be aggregated >> Number of channel-groups in use: 1 >> Number of aggregators: 1 >> >> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports >> ------+-------------+-----------+--------------------------------------- >> ------+-------------+-----------+---- >> ---- >> 16 Po16(RD) LACP Te4/16(D) Te6/5(D) >> >> gv(config-if)# >> >> interface TenGigabitEthernet4/16 >> shutdown >> channel-group 16 mode passive >> end >> >> interface TenGigabitEthernet6/5 >> shutdown >> channel-group 16 mode passive >> end >> >> gv#show version | i SX >> Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN- >> M), >> Version 12.2(33)SXI5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) >> ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) System >> image file is "sup-bootdisk:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin" >> gv# >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
