On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:56:13 AM Mack McBride wrote: > This is definitely in the roadmap from discussions with > Cisco. However a firm date hasn't been given. > It appears to be fairly high priority as the routing > table is growing and the 6500s and Nexus 7Ks aren't > going to get any larger TCAM (Stuck at 1M/0, 512K/256K, > 640k/192K depending on how you chop it up).
The thing is, I don't believe there will be a single, (specifically-)defined technology to solve the table growth issue. S-VA may be one that is applicable in the edge. Those who are so inclined may use MPLS in the core. The brave ones might try LISP or ILNP. And those who prefer low-tech. will simply filter longer prefixes (where longer prefixes may mean different things to different people). Bottom line, unlikely there will be a single solution that addresses all topologies, needless to say, topologies within the same routing domain. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
