I would like to admit that RR (route reflector) is not the same feature as RS (route server). Which one is actually needed?
Aivars > On 1/23/12 18:45 , Michael Lambert wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I was wondering if anyone could comment on experiences (production or >> otherwise) with BGP route server functionality on the ASR1000 series/IOS-XE. >> Can you >> offer any comparisons (stability, configuration, table sizes, etc) between >> it and the open-source implementations (quagga, BIRD, OpenBGPD)? >> > Hi Michael, > ASR1000 is good choice when you plan to deploy RR in your networks. High > performance is one of key factors when you looking for right platform. > It's also scalable and provides flexible CoPP mechanisms, hardware and > software redundancy. Not to mention good price to performance ratio > especially if you are planning to deploy ASR1001 which performance can > be upgraded using license while your network is growing. Table size > depends on how much DRAM you put in it. Check datasheets for details > about how many prefixes you can store. > All other solutions are just software running on Linux or Unix systems > so they are dependent on hardware platform performance and stability. > Not really good option imo. > Regards, _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
