Hi, On 14 March 2012 11:59, Dan Armstrong <d...@beanfield.com> wrote: > I know this topic has been discussed a million times, but just wanted to get > an updated opinion on how people are feeling about this: > > > In a service provider network, how do people feel about putting the big > Internet routing table, all their peers and customers inside a VRF? Keep the > global table for just infrastructure links…
In my previous role we've done just that. One internet VRF for all transit functions, separate vrfs for peering and customers and import-export statements to tie them all together. All done on ASR1k (mainly 1006, but a few of 1002 as well). kind regards Pshem _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
