Hi, On 14 March 2012 22:04, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:12:02PM +1300, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: >> In my previous role we've done just that. One internet VRF for all >> transit functions, separate vrfs for peering and customers and >> import-export statements to tie them all together. > > What is the benefit? The obvious drawback is "much more complicated, > more possible ways things can blow up, and more effort to setup and > maintain".
Easy separation into 'infrastructure' and 'services' spaces. From that perspective internet is just another service that's being offered. Ability to offer connectivity to resources only as required; so for example someone needs only domestic/peering and not full transit - they connection vrf only imports particular RT and it's all sorted. kind regards Pshem _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
