Thanks... we'll find out soon enough...;) -----Original Message----- From: Tom Storey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: April-04-12 9:42 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 1811/1841 Performance with PPPOE
The 1811 is supposedly even more powerful than the low end 2800's. And on that note, Ive seen a 2801 acting as a LAC (so thats accept PPPoE and forward on via L2TP) for ~100 sessions and barely breaking a sweat. Traffic levels were quite low though (i.e. <= 10mbit/sec perhaps), so that might explain the low CPU util. On 2 April 2012 14:39, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey folks. > > > > Just wondering regarding performance impacts on 1811/1841 when > terminating PPPOE on the router? The "router spec sheet" from Cisco > (http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/ > router > performance.pdf) shows about 35Mb/s of traffic on one of these routers > but if you also have 100-150 PPPOE users terminating on the router, > how much does this affect the throughput numbers? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
