Hi, On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:07:12PM -0400, Robert Johnson wrote: > Okay, I believe I've found my problem. > > My primary address statement had a typo that put it outside of the > OSPF network definitions. Apparently when the primary address on an > interface isn't picked up by a particular OSPF process, none of the > associated secondary addresses will be either.
That's well-understood.
Area definitions in OSPF only look at the primary addresses (on Cisco IOS
devices, $J doesn't have the concept of a "primary" IPv4 address on
an interface at all).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpshGv6J72Y4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
