Is this normal/expected when converting from full mesh mp-ibgp to dual redundant rr's ?
this is output from one of my pe's learning routes from my dual hub pe's (.1 and .2) (.4 and .8.2 are just two other pe's) sh bgp vpnv4 u al sum ... 10.101.0.1 4 65000 2540 2700 11707 0 0 1d16h 150 10.101.0.2 4 65000 2454 2689 11707 0 0 1d16h 179 10.101.0.4 4 65000 2660 2929 11707 0 0 1d20h 1 10.101.8.2 4 65000 1451 1442 11707 0 0 21:41:46 3 ---- now after config'ing dual RR at dual hub pe's (.1 and .2) I see the following... sh bgp vpnv4 u al sum ... 10.101.0.1 4 65000 40 18 6116 0 0 00:11:04 333 10.101.0.2 4 65000 35 13 6116 0 0 00:07:33 333 150 + 179 + 1 + 3 = 333 So is it normal to see all available routes *from both* of my rr's? Also, is this the only thing needed on the rr side? I did this on both hub pe's (.1 and .2) I just want to make sure that adding the cluster id globally to bgp is the right thing to do. ( pretty much only use my pe's for vpnv4 mpls l3vpn ... currently not doing any ipv4 native between my pe's) router bgp 65000 bgp cluster-id 1 commit (of course also I specified on the two hub pe's that all my neighbors are route-reflector-client) Aaron _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
