Might want to look at the 5525-X. Rated at 2Gbps, so with basic services turned on should get very close to handling a gig with NAT enabled. I'm not sure about FCS on the new boxes though.
-ryan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Huff Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 12:11 PM To: 'Chuck Church'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ? If you need the full 1GB for VPN, yes, the 5585-X with SSP10 will be the best bet. It will probably be on the close order of 20k though. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139 > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Church > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 12:02 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ? > > Since everything looks like Ethernet, why not consider an ASA 5585-X? > This is probably the cheapest thing you'll find that can do a gigabit > of VPN. > > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 11:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ? > > Thats what I was afraid someone was going to say :) I guess its time > to start looking into the ASRs and see what my options are. > > Thanks all! Really appreciate the help and information. > > Dave > > On 04/30/2012 08:50 AM, Aled Morris wrote: > > On 30 April 2012 16:40, Dave <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Thank you all for the responses. I actually found the PDF shortly > > after sending the e-mail. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. > (Also a > > part of me was hoping the PDF was wrong). So for an office router > > that will do GigE + VPN + NAT anyone have any recommendations ? > Is > > it the ASR1k or bust now days ? > > > > > > You're only going to get near gigabit performance with hardware > > forwarding, so ASR is your best bet. Switch platforms with Layer 3 > > (like the Catalyst 3560-X) aren't going to support the features you > > need in their forwarding ASICs so you'll get performance worse than > > the ISR2 you've already tried. > > > > Aled > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
