Hi Rens, It depends of course largely on the transmission speed you need, but most cisco device up from say an 1841 for low speed links will do quite well. The only thing you should keep in mind that the majority of the TCP enhancers cannot optimize encrypted traffic very efficiently, so you should put hem in the unencrypted part of the link, or let the optimizers do the encryption. If you want some more info on how we are doing things like you need, you can contact me off-list (In Dutch if you wish).
Regards, Martin >-----Original Message----- >From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- >boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rens >Sent: 30/04/2012 12:00 >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >Subject: [c-nsp] VPN over satellite > >Dear, > > > >Could anybody recommend any cisco hardware that can build a VPN that >works >well over satellite connections? (TCP enhancements) > >I want to setup a L3 VPN between 2 satellite connections > > > >Even additionally if it would also support WAN bonding even better >because I >also have a scenario to connect 2 times 2 satellites to have more >capacity >for my L3 VPN > > > >Regards, > > > >Rens > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
