In the absense of Waris chiming in, PBR isn't yet supported on the
ME3600, I believe.
Last posting about this as of Dec 2011 was that PBR was on the roadmap,
and I haven't yet seen it come up as a new feature in any of the
software releases subsequent to this.
You may (or may not) be able to configure it in the CLI, but it isn't
supported, so YMMV.
My understanding of most access/floor switches such as the 3560/3750
that do support PBR though is that PBR can be done at line rate on those
platforms. Certainly it will load up a software based router but on a
hardware based switch it should be nearly if not totally hitless.
Reuben
On 17/05/2012 12:08 PM, Dan Letkeman wrote:
This switch will never need to hold a bgp table. I do how ever want
to do PBR, and I am finding mixed messages on if it works or not. And
if it does work will it work in my situation or will it switch in
software and have poor performance? The idea of using it as an
aggregation switch would mean that it would have to do PBR at line
speed which it probably won't do. I don't know if there is a better
way to do what I am trying to accomplish but my scenario is like this:
traffic -->---me3600x-----router a------firewall
|
-----router b-----firewall
All I want to do is PBR some traffic to router b. The link speed
will be either 1gbps fiber or 2gbps etherchannel, and if I apply a
route-map on an interface at that speed will it choke? If so what
other option do I have?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
