Hi, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Thursday, May 24, 2012 02:39:20 PM Gert Doering wrote: > > > Well, I'd interpret that as "it is not connected to the > > PCI bus, so won't eat bandwidth points from there". Not > > as "will do distributed anything". > > Right, that was my interpretation too, but for me, each port > performed the same, so it was a non-starter.
If I'm not mistaken, the other 3 GE ports are directly connected
to the CPU on the SoC - so "no bus at all".
The difference would be "... if compared to a PA-GE sitting on the
classic PCI bus".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpJdLmH3ia9C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
