I know that with Packet Marking, NAT and Firewall enabled with 512byte frames you will get 50Mbps (symmetric) throughput out of a 2921 (cpu running at 75%)
If this were a router to provide Internet to end users then you would have more traffic dowload than upload and with 50Mb download and say an upload of around 25% of that then the cpu would probably tick over at around 40%. If you don't need Firewall and Marking then a lower model router would do, I reckon a 1921, not sure of the G1's only tested G2's Thanks Rick On 31 May 2012 12:39, Rens <[email protected]> wrote: > Where do you get that info that a 1841 & 2811 can't do this? > > They do fine average Internet traffic @ 50Mbps > > I got 2811's doing 100Mbps > > > > Indeed my wifi setup can cope with 2K connections > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On > Behalf Of Aled Morris > Sent: woensdag 30 mei 2012 17:09 > To: Rens > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP & NAT router limitations > > > > On 30 May 2012 11:17, Rens <[email protected]> wrote: > > For a one day wifi event I'm looking which kind of router can be used to > deliver DHCP & NAT for 1000-2000 simultaneous users > > Total WAN capacity will be +- 50Mbps > > Would a 1841 or a 2811 be able to handle all this NAT/DHCP? > > > Neither of these would cope with 50Mbps even without the NAT. > > If you are purely Ethernet then the cheapest Cisco solution would be an > ASA5505 > > I assume you've already got a wifi setup that can cope with 2,000 > connections. > > Aled > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
