> 6pe should only be a stopgap until the devices can do native. If you run 6PE on L2TPv3 core than maybe, otherwise I don't see any added value in running IPv6 in the MPLS core
adam -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 12:16 PM To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Basic understanding of 6PE and 6VPE If the intermediary routers are ipv6 capable don't omit placing an ipv6 address on interfaces. 6pe should only be a stopgap until the devices can do native. Jared Mauch On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:01 AM, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[email protected]> wrote: > All iBGP sessions between the 6PE or 6VPE are actually carried over IPv4 transport, so intermediate P routers are not aware of any of this and can be IPv4 only. > > that's how I would desribe it. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
