Sure, but it may be usable for some that already have windows servers vs a *nix 
systems.

Getting within a few seconds is a major feat for some folks i've observed :)  
-- (myself included at times)

There are other people who have built win32 binaries of the xntp software, e.g.:

http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/ntp.htm

I was trying to stick with Microsoft provided software for those in a win32 
environment.

- Jared

On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:37 AM, James Slepicka (c-nsp) wrote:

> Just be aware that the Windows Time service isn't terribly accurate, so it 
> may not be suitable for some environments:
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/939322
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 11:23 AM
> To: Josh Baird
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NTP Servers
> 
> Or you can ask the it guys to use a windows server... Eg:
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816042
> 
> On Jun 23, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> It seems like a waste to spend money on "NTP appliances," when you can 
>> build an "enterprise quality" system using Linux (for free) in a 
>> matter of minutes.  We run three, and they have supported over 10k 
>> devices with zero problems for over 5 years.  It's not like ntpd is very 
>> resource intensive.
>> 
>> Josh
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from a mobile device
>>> 
>>> On 23/06/2012, at 15:05, Mack McBride <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> A good linux server will suffice.
>>>> 6500s have a pretty wimpy CPU.
>>>> This is from a linux server with a cheap atom board:
>>> 
>>> Agreed - If it were only me, I too would run a couple of boxes, but 
>>> this is an enterprise site.
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately the team here has little unix know how which is why I 
>>> am looking for appliances. The plan is that all the network 
>>> infracture and wireless gear - mostly cisco would use these servers - 
>>> so no more than
>>> 10000 devices - would like something with a stable clock however. We 
>>> have already had some authentication issues due to times being in the 
>>> future.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Andrew
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to