Also, If you're doing bgp signaled vpls, you may find issues with MTU, this will help:
l2vpn autodiscovery bgp signaling-protocol bgp mtu mismatch ignore I haven't quite got it figured out whether this is a problem with C or J from looking through RFC's....but thar be dragons. On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:29 PM, chip <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been pretty happy with it overall, so far. > > The things I don't like: > > Not being able to insert rpl policy without having to re-do the whole > policy. Yes, I know you can edit it with the built-in nano, emacs, or > vi editors, but that's kinda difficult to script, eh? Also, you must > have your TERM evironment var set to vt100, if it's set to xterm it > won't work. And yes I know you can upload it from a file, but again, > it's the whole thing. > > Console port (for at least the RSP440's) requires 8n2 setting, again, > no big deal, but a bit annoying having to change stuff around. > > GLC-T SFP's aren't supported, SFP-GE-T's are, this seemed to change > from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1, not the support, but the enforcement of it. > > No RIP-NG support > > I really wish there was a "commit and quit" > > Some of the LPTS settings seem a bit low and it you must change the > settings on each line card. Add a new card, gotta add a new line of > config. > > The "commit confirmed" command will default to just doing a commit if > you don't specify a time, it's counter-intuitive > > I kind of miss using network statements with OSPF instead of it > getting ALL networks configured on an interface. > > Using ACLs to restrict telnet/ssh access gets strange if you use > layer-4 port definitions in your acl, just stick to source prefix. > > So...so far nothing really huge or show stopping, but just little nit > picks. I will say that there are several things it does do that's > quite nice. Like being able to get counters for accepts/drops between > the phy-->np-->bridge-->fia is pretty handy, and there's a command to > show you the mappings. The "monitor" capability and being able to use > things like grep and wc on show commands. Satellite stuff is pretty > intriguing as well. > > Hope that helps a bit....and if I'm wrong on any of the above, I would > LOVE some education. > > Thanks! > > --chip > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:56 PM, MKS <[email protected]> wrote: >> We are in the process of evaluating the ASR9K as a next gen platform >> >> I would like to ask you, what was most surprising about the platform, >> e.g. I expected that to be there, or this is a strange limitation. >> Does the ASR9K halv the tcam space like 7600 when enabling uRPF? >> >> Regards >> MKS >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > -- > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc.... -- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc.... _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
