Hi, On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Juan Mario Duenas Preciado wrote: > Could anyone give a hint on where am I wrong?
Not using a /64 for the LAN.
If your network is not big enough for your number of subnets, get a bigger
one from your provider.
(I'm somewhat curious, admittedly, to see the first network where a /48 will
not have enough /64s to number all subnets)
I can't speak for other regions, but in RIPE land, the policies very
clearly allow giving large-enough addresses to a customer/enterprise/
network (whatever you are) to make sure that end-users will NEVER have
to use non-/64 networks or N:1 NAT. (Some still think that's a good
reason, but don't blaim it on address policy).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgprBanfoDIYL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
