Yes. Basically I dont have any problems with routing.
I just encountered intermittency in my simulation.
So by design and theory, I want to confirm if Single profile, multiple dynamic 
phase2 will work.
So CPE router1 will transmit data to VPN Concentrator via IPSEC tunnel,
Then VPN concentrator will forward data to CPE router2 via the same IPSEC 
tunnel.
Same Phase1, different phase2.
I would like to confirm if different tunnels are required in order to forward 
traffic from one remote CE to another remote CE.



________________________________
 From: Charlie Burns <[email protected]>
To: Randy <[email protected]>; cisco-nsp <[email protected]>; ar 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] IPSEC Hub and Spoke -  Single crypto profile, Multiple 
dynamic-map
 
If your match acl permits the traffic you just need reverse route injection on 
the dynamic-map and redistribute static into MP-BGP.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:52 PM
To: cisco-nsp; ar
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC Hub and Spoke - Single crypto profile, Multiple 
dynamic-map

why am I thinking same security traffic permit intra-interface
./Randy

--- On Tue, 7/10/12, ar <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: ar <[email protected]>
> Subject: [c-nsp] IPSEC Hub and Spoke -  Single crypto profile, Multiple 
> dynamic-map
> To: "cisco-nsp" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 4:43 PM
> 
> 
> Hi.
>  
> I am trying to setup a dynamic IPSEC  remote access for
> MPLS VPNs.
>  
> Setup is;
>  
> - one 7200 as VPN concentrator
> - mulitple remote CPE connected via 3G Internet doing IPSEC
> with the concentrator
>  
> Objective is:
> - Remote CPE LAN to another remote CPE LAN traffic 
> 
>  
> My config is a single Phase 1, but mulitple Phase 2.
>  
> Is it possible to have inter-site traffic via the hub using
> the same IPSEC tunnel?
> Or it has to be different tunnel per site?
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  
> VPN Concentrator Config:
>  
> crypto keyring custC-key vrf FVRF-C
>   pre-shared-key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 key customerC
>  
> crypto isakmp policy 1
> encr 3des
> authentication pre-share
> group 2
>  
>  
> crypto isakmp profile custC-profile
>    vrf VRF-C
>    keyring custC-key
>    match identity address 0.0.0.0 FVRF-C
>  
> crypto dynamic-map custC-map 10
> set transform-set IPSEC
> set isakmp-profile custC-profile
> match address 104
> 
> crypto dynamic-map custC-map 20
> set transform-set IPSEC
> set isakmp-profile custC-profile
> match address 105
> 
> crypto dynamic-map custC-map 30
> set transform-set IPSEC
> set isakmp-profile custC-profile
> match address 106
> 
> crypto dynamic-map custC-map 40
> set transform-set IPSEC
> set isakmp-profile custC-profile
> match address 108
> 
> crypto dynamic-map custC-map 50
> set transform-set IPSEC
> set isakmp-profile custC-profile
> match address 109
>  
>  
>  Comments?
>  
> thanks
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5124 - Release Date: 07/10/12
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to