The first release of IOS that supported routing on 2960S was useless.

I deployed a stack of 4 2960S with about 4 or 5 vlans performing intervlan 
routing and a single static default route, and the individual switches would 
constantly crash and reload.

Had to wait nearly 6 months for  a new IOS to be released to fix the issue.

Andrew Jones

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Still
Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012 2:19 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: 2960S

I had problems with stacking these when they first came out but I think it was 
either a software issue that's been fixed or an environmental issue where we 
were freezing the units in a room that was too cold.  Otherwise I don't think 
there's been too many horror stories with 2960S's.  I would rather spend a 
little more and install 4500-E's myself though.

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Scott Voll <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyone using the 2960S series switches?
>
> Comments good, bad, or otherwise?
>
> We are looking at using them to replace our 3560's in the IDF's.
>
> Straight layer 2.  We will stack them.  Currently we are not doing any 
> IPv6 but are planning for in in 2013.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



--
[[email protected] ~]$ cat .signature
cat: .signature: No such file or directory [[email protected] ~]$ 
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to