Well, 19xx with a proper licensing will work. Everything else depends on pps and scale.
Aivars > I would recommend looking at the lower end ASR1Ks for that... Maybe ASR1001... > Arie > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 04:24 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS over GRE/IPSEC > What is the smallest Cisco device that can do 1Gbit/sec of MPLS over GRE over > IPSEC? > On the LAN side, the device will need to do VLANS, IPv4 & IPv4, > HSRP, multicast and possibly some basic QoS for VoIP prioritisation. On the > WAN side, the device > will need to tunnel MPLS L3VPN over GRE, then IPSec-protect the GRE > traffic. Obviously it will need BGP/LDP. Physical interfaces will need to be > 2x gigE, and the > device will actually need to forward 1gig or very close to it. > The background here is that we have some remote sites we want to > bring back into our MPLS L3VPN. We can obtain an IP connection with large MTU > more cheaply than > we can obtain an ethernet circuit, and we've been asked to price up some > options. > Personally I think this architecture would be needlessly complex > and likely more expensive, but I need to know what kit would be needed before > I can price it up. > If anyone has any more general comments (e.g. "don't do it for reason > X") I'd be interested to hear them. > Cheers, > Phil > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
