Also, can I have a mesh of tunnels between (3) different endpoints, so 3 different cisco 800's with (2) tunnels per 800 to the other (2) 800's, such that (3) lan switches hanging off the lan side of the 800's appear to be all 3 meshed together AND PASS STP/CDP/VTP, etc ?
Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:57 AM To: Aaron; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] l2tpv3 Aaron, You should be able to deploy L2TPv3 with the smaller ISR routers... The 800 series support it (not sure what software feature set is needed...) Arie -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 08:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] l2tpv3 What is the smallest/cheapest cisco router that supports L2TPv3? I work at an isp and have small/medium sized businesses that occasionally want transparent lan connectivity between their sites (which are connected via FTTH, DSL, Cable Modem). Is L2TPv3 tunneling the way to go for something like that ? I don't really want to set up all kinds of qinq or mpls l2vpn's in my core if I can avoid it. Also, tunneling endpoints at the customer premise seems that the dslam/olt/cmts would not have to be wise at all about the tunneling architecture. Lemme know your thoughts/suggestions please Aaron _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
