[email protected] a écrit sur 09/09/2012 07:21:13 AM : > Peter Rathlev <[email protected]> > > So you mean the client will get one GUA together with ULA, if the > > client just need to communicate inside the site, then will choice the > > ULA, if need to access Internet, then will choice the GUA? > > That sounds right. And you can assign only ULA to a client that would > never need to communicate with anything on the Internet, but I guess > very few machines fall in that category these days.
We deployed ULA+GUA in our environment, a mid-size cable ISP. We also prevent ULA-GUA communications at the datacenter edge. So far it's been working very well, only found one instance of bad source address selection in a product. Btw, we have plenty of ULA-only servers and devices. No problem on that side, but of course, we'd have to disable IPv4 to be really sure of that. ;) /JF _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
