Hi, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:59:33PM -0500, root net wrote: > We will probably go the conventional L3 switch way with the Cisco 65xx and > a major sup. > If you have any recommendations they are welcomed for this.
Doing 2.5G SDH/SONET on the 6500 is way expensive. For GigE and a
limited amount of 10GE ports it's a nice box.
Read up the various discussions in the c-nsp archives about limitations
and drawbacks of the architecture, though - it's a switch with routing
bolted on, and it shows in some places.
(Nevertheless it's a trusty workhose, all our network runs on 6500s
except for the lower-speed access stuff (E1, E3, STM1) which is on 7200s)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp9ynIEWo0hq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
