Thank you all for the valuable input. I have now ordered 2 asr1001 to replace my 7206vxr NPE-G2s. I only expect to service ~400 spokes per router so these routers with ESP 2.5 should be OK, I think. I am sticking to phase 2. I have split our global network into 4 regional (dual) DMVPNs with dual hubs - interconnected via a MPLS backbone. More manageable that way, imho. So staying away from phase 3 for now. I will however move from EIGRP to BGP dynamic peer groups.
Thanks again. Nasir -----Original Message----- From: d lists [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: dinsdag 18 september 2012 3:30 To: Nasir Shaikh Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Any experience with DMVPN on ASR1K? We use ASR 1002 + ESP 5 as VPN hubs using both a dual tunnel and a SLB type architecture (different hubs for different types). Currently terminating 3500-4000 remote sites per ASR @ 12% cpu. Plan on moving to BGP + dynamic neighbor in the near future, we'll see how that scales. Current routing is a mix of static, eigrp & RIP passive. Very happy with the ASR once the early IOS versions got sorted. -dlists95 On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Nasir Shaikh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > > > We are planning to replace/upgrade our DMVPN hubs from 7206vxr npe-G2 with > VAM2+ to ASR1Ks. > > Does anyone have any experience with running DMVPN on the ASRs? > > > > This is what we plan to order: > > > > Cisco ASR1001 System,Crypto, 4 built-in GE, Dual P/S > > Cisco ASR 1001 IOS XE UNIVERSAL > > Cisco ASR 1000 Advanced IP Services License > > IPSEC License for ASR1000 Series > > Cisco ASR1001 4GB DRAM > > > > Thanks > > > > Nasir > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
