Aaron >this seemed funny to me....i've never seen this before, but then again >I've >never done 6vpe before either...so....what is meant by this "indirectly >connected" ? > >noc-3600#sh ipv ro vrf one >IPv6 Routing Table - one - 5 entries >Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static route > B - BGP, R - RIP, I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2 > IA - ISIS interarea, IS - ISIS summary, ND - ND Default, NDp - ND >Prefix > DCE - Destination, NDr - Redirect, O - OSPF Intra, OI - OSPF Inter > OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2, ON1 - OSPF NSSA ext 1 > ON2 - OSPF NSSA ext 2 >B ::/0 [200/0] > via 10.101.0.254%default, indirectly connected >B 2121:2121::/32 [200/0] > via 10.101.0.254%default, indirectly connected
quoting http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipv6/configuration/15-2mt/ip6-o v-mpls-6vpe.html: "From an IPv6 routing perspective, entries reachable over the MPLS backbone are listed as being indirectly connected, because MPLS is providing a Layer 2 tunnel mechanism." in earlier 6PE releases we used to tag these routes with "IPv6-MPLS".. not sure which one I prefer ;-) oli _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
