@Adam and @Mike What versions of Junos have you seen the limitations? -James
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 07:20:26 AM Oliver Boehmer > (oboehmer) wrote: > > > There is a limit how far an LSR can peek into the frame > > for loadsharing hash decisions (I recall 10 labels deep > > on the CRS). Other than that, the MTU is the limit. > > > > CRS can push a max of 7 labels onto the stack, ASR9k does > > 6.. Don't think there is any use-case (yet?) that would > > need to push that many labels. > > The OP is right, I have seen Juniper routers (both MX- and > M-series) log error messages in certain scenarios, > particularly if the stack was larger than 3 labels, if my > memory is anything to go by. This was Junos 10.4R4.5. > > In my case, that log was on the back of an NG-MVPN > deployment, and only participating routers logged the issue. > That said, the log never resulted in any service issues. It > appeared while were troubleshooting something else. > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
