I'm not even using subinterfaces. I just have 2 physicals in an LACP bundle and the port-channel has the layer 3 config. This is the message I get:
router(config-if)#service-policy input TRANSIT_IN service-policy input TRANSIT_IN not supported on this target Relevant config: ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 no ip address load-interval 30 no negotiation auto channel-group 1 mode active ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1 no ip address load-interval 30 no negotiation auto channel-group 1 mode active ! interface Port-channel1 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 ip access-group isp-filter-in in no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip flow ingress ip flow egress load-interval 30 no negotiation auto Looking for any kind of workaround. All L3 interfaces on this router are port-channels. From: CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 4:01 PM To: Dikkema, Michael (Business Technology); [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Ingress QoS on ASR 1000 LACP bundles Hi, Yes, ASR does not support ingress/egress QOS on portchan subints - It will be supported (apparently) in 15.3S/3.8.0S (Which I believe will be available by EOY?) - there is a work-around though. 1. Upgrade to 15.2(4)S1, and issue "port-channel load-balancing vlan-manual", and you will then be able to assign ingress+egress policy-maps to portchan subints Below is lab ASR1006 running 15.2(4)S1 with port-channel load-balancing vlan-manual enabled: Router#sh policy-map interface Port-channel1.90 Service-policy input: input_policy Class-map: class-default (match-any) 125 packets, 10321 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps .... Service-policy output: ERA-LEGAL-4Mb Class-map: class-default (match-any) 1938500 packets, 198784733 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps interface Port-channel1.90 description NETFLOW encapsulation dot1Q 90 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip proxy-arp ip flow ingress service-policy input input_policy service-policy output ERA-LEGAL-4Mb HTH. > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:38:43 -0600 > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Ingress QoS on ASR 1000 LACP bundles > > I cannot assign a service-policy input statement to an LACP port-channel > interface on an ASR 1002 router. The console gives an error saying it's not > possible. I have found documentation from Cisco stating that it's not > supported under any current software. Putting the service policy onto the > physical members has no effect. > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:18:46AM -0600, Dikkema, Michael (Business > Technology) wrote: > > Is there any way to get ingress QoS working on LACP on ASR 1000 series? > > What do you mean with "ingress QoS" exactly? > > I'd be interested to learn about any QoS "surprises" on ASR1k. > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
