On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote: > And if we end up modifying the RFP to make the basic IPv6 support > optional we have hopefully at least sent a signal.
Yes. The signal is "ignore mandatory IPv6 requirements - they will get dropped to optional anyway" - which is the partyline I hear from multiple vendors about IPv6 requirements in RFPs. They are very relaxed about those, and it shows unfortunately. > And RA guard and ND inspection would be mandatory no matter what. Mandatory as in "we'll buy 100% more expensive equipment when noone else delivers that"? Or "we'll buy nothing if nobody delivers that"? Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
