Sorry, I meant the copper 100 meg ntap, not the gig or ten gig model. :-) On Jan 4, 2013 1:41 AM, "Phil Mayers" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 07:50 AM, Mike Hale wrote: > >> I've had good experience with the ntap copper devices. >> >> Their basic 10gig copper passive tap is uber cheap too. >> > > Is there any such thing as a "genuine" copper passive tap at 10g? I was > under the impression that it was impossible, given the differential > signalling, and such devices at 1gig are invariably powered. > > We've used ntap optical taps - they work as advertised, and there's a > little rackmount thing that can take 3 of them. We specifically use the > two-channel one to mirror a 20g port channel. > > For analysis, we use a server with 2x 2port 10g myricom NICs and gulp ;o) > ______________________________**_________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> > archive at > http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
