On 21/01/2013 17:31, Aaron wrote: > Ha love it. Thanks Nick > > What is the definition of "large L2 domain" please. ?
this sort of size: |.....................................| :-) Nick > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:12 AM > To: Aaron > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] unknown unicast flooding - particularly regarding > fhrp's > > On 21/01/2013 16:56, Aaron wrote: >> is it all about lower arp timeouts below 300 secs so to artificially >> prop-up bridge tables and keep them fresh? My goodness that's making >> arp very busy. > > It's all about keeping the cam timeout on your switch higher than the arp > timeout on your routers and servers. ARP won't be particularly busy because > you're not going to have large L2 domains, right? Right? > > Nick > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
