There is going to be a lot, as this will be carrying 90% of our ISP
customers traffic. It's the aggregation point for all our customers
connecting through the core to our internet routers. Would i be better
off using a separate aggregation switch, then dumping into the 6506?
Was trying to save money by using the 6506.
On 1/23/2013 11:37 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 23/01/2013 17:20, Ross Halliday wrote:
You want 802.1Q tunnelling, frequently referred to as Q-in-Q. Basically:
Bear in mind that QinQ tunnelling like this will cause the switch to learn
all the mac addresses on all those vlans once more. I.e. once on ingress
and once while tunnelling. You need to make sure that you're not going to
blow any resource limits if you have lots of different mac addresses on
these vlans.
Nick
--
---- ---- ---- ----
Chris Gotstein, Network Engineer, U.P. Logon/Computer Connection U.P.
http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | [email protected]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
