More configurable comes with a price. I'd rather have the extra bulk of configuration with the option for more complexity, rather than a second piece of hardware when those complex situations arise.
Sent from my iPhone 5 On Feb 17, 2013, at 14:18, "Terry Baranski" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday, Feb 17 2013, Jeff Kell wrote: > >> This is the most bizarre "update" I've ever seen :( > > Yep, our NAT config sizes also increased dramatically (and became much more > cumbersome) for similar reasons. Confirmed with multiple TAC engineers that > there's no easier way (in our case at least). > > Spectacular work by Cisco on this one. > > -Terry > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
