Yes it's additional complexity indeed, though we would use SSM so no RPs in the core and no inter-as mvpns(so far :) ) so need for RPF proxy-vectors Yes I'd love to go with MLDP though unfortunately it's not supported on me3600's
adam -----Original Message----- From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christ...@errxtx.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:05 PM To: Adam Vitkovsky Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] pros and cons for IPTV multicast in rosen-mvpn vs GRT A lot of complexity, protocol overhead, data mdt scalability, more state, more bugs, PIM pimping / RPF vector, more RPs in case of sparse-mode... If VPN is mandatory I would go MLDP if supported. -- Christian On 18.02.2013, at 16:09, Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkov...@swan.sk> wrote: > Hi folks, > Are there any cons for running IPTV in draft-rosen-mvpn as opposed to > global routing table > > adam > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
