Andrey/Andrew, It will be a very small network to begin with - single P router, single PE router and a number of switches for hosting. This will hopefuly quickly scale to a dual-site configuration with two P routers and two PE routers but even then it will still be small in the grand scheme of things. In terms of Internet services, I was planning on delivering these in an Internet VRF and there is no requirement for a full routing table yet Thanks Gordon
________________________________ From: Andrey Petrenko <[email protected]> To: Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> Cc: Gordon Bryan <[email protected]>; Cisco NSP <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2013, 22:28 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in SP Core How many upstream you planned? Size of you network? -- With best regards, Andrey 'sshd' Petrenko xmmp\gtalk: andy.petrenko at gmail.com skype: andy.petrenko web: http://sshd.by/ 11.03.2013, в 1:12, Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> написал(а): > >Sent from a mobile device > >On 11/03/2013, at 8:44, Gordon Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi Group, >> > >> >I'm heading towards the final stages of planning a new MPLS core network and >I'm currently stuck in two minds between public or private addressing for the >core. >> > >> >Where do you plan to store the Internet routing table? In a vrf or global? >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
