Hello,

is there some guide that covers the "this will go to the RP on Sup..." and
the "this will also affect ..." and "this is limited to xy
interfaces/vlans/routes" stuff ?

We thought about implementing strict mode on some customer interfaces
(those special customers who always get attacked and sometimes take
revenge ;)) some time ago, but then saw that doc here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/secure.html

We stopped after reading those sentences (it even does not mantion any
IPv6 limitations):
"The most recently configured mode is automatically applied to all ports
configured for unicast RPF check."
"When you enter the ip verify unicast source reachable-via command, the
unicast RPF check mode changes on all ports in the switch."

If that is not just a bad/wrong explanation or a joke, what sense makes
urpf if it cannot be enabled and configured for each interface
individually and as a consequence of this cannot be implemented without
possible service impact ?

I am sure we are not the only ones that do not actvate it because it may
cause more problems than it will solve.
btw, if there is a way to enable it for single (vlan)interfaces (up to a
few hundred) without any effect for other interfaces, please let me know.

kind regards
Rolf

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 03:59:25PM -0700, Laurent Geyer wrote:
>> Curious, how does uRPF help under this scenario? Although the source
>> address is spoofed, the target is stil valid destination address.
>
> uRPF helps everybody else - those of your customers with infected machines
> (and don't claim there aren't any) will not be able to initiate reflection
> attacks against other folks.
>
> gert,
>   deploying uRPF since 10+ years "it's really not that hard"
>
> (PS: and yes, the fact that Sup720 can't do IPv6 uRPF in hardware stinks)
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                            //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> [email protected]
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to