Here's the scenario. I have customer services coming into VRFs Those customer vrfs import the necessary routes from vrf SERVICES. The interface in vrf MAIN has an OSPF session back to my core. Is it better to route-target import like I have it now, or for each customer vrf to do a route-target export to a common target? Or... is there a better way to redistribute the routes to customer networks for my services to access?
ip vrf 2030 rd 65000:2001 route-target export 65000:2001 route-target import 65000:2030 route-target import 60522:100 !... ip vrf 2030 rd 65000:2030 route-target export 65000:2030 route-target import 65000:2030 route-target import 60522:100 ip vrf SERVICES rd 60522:100 route-target export 60522:100 route-target import 60522:100 ip vrf MAIN rd 65000:100 route-target export 65000:100 route-target import 65000:100 route-target import 65000:2010 route-target import 65000:2001 route-target import 65000:2002 route-target import 65000:2003 route-target import 65000:2004 route-target import 65000:2005 !... route-target import 65000:2027 route-target import 65000:2028 route-target import 65000:2029 route-target import 65000:2030 --Karl Karl Putland Senior VoIP Engineer *SimpleSignal* 3600 S Yosemite, Suite 150 Denver, CO 80237 One Number Rings All My Phones: 303-242-8608 SimpleSignal.com <http://www.simplesignal.com/> | Blog<http://www.simplesignal.com/blog> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/SimpleSignal?ref=ts> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/simplesignal> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
