Sorry - too early in the morning - ignore my last post - thought you were referring to VSS on Sup2T - didnt see the VPLS.
:( On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sander, > > It definitely works. A colleague of mine installed one two weeks ago. > > I would recommend that you use both ports on the supervisor rather than on > a line card for the VSL (Link). > The 6908 should work for VSL, the 6704 won't - but it can be used for > other traffic. > > Regards > > Andrew > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Sander Steffann <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We're trying to implement VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T >> (VSS) as described in >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-663645.html#wp9000139and >> constantly failing. It seems so simple: set up a VSS, use LACP or PAgP >> port-channels to the distribution switches and do VPLS on the VSS. It just >> doesn't seem to work. Using WS-X6908-10G-2TXL line cards already gives less >> problems than with WS-X6704-10GE line cards, but still it fails to work >> very often. I sometimes wonder if I am going mad or if this setup has never >> actually been tested... >> >> So: has anybody ever set up a network like this, or am I really beta >> testing for Cisco now? >> >> Cheers, >> Sander Steffann >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
