On 19/04/2013 13:51, Sander Steffann wrote: > Any reason why you're not using plain switchports and vlans? The 6500 is > a switch after all :-)
... for the same reason you would want an mpls p/w instead of point-to-point vlan for remote connectivity. I.e. no special hacks to handle STP, local discovery protocols, etc; carrier state is preserved, and you're not chewing up l2 cam space on the networking infrastructure and doing mac limiting on the customer. I have often wanted this particular feature to get me out of a hole. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
