On (2013-04-23 09:35 +0200), Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Anyways my question was regarding the "old school" VPLS as we all do it > right now and LDP vs BGP signaling in particular. > I'd like to find out which one do you folks prefer and why.
BGP, for all customer stuff, BGP. LDP only for IGP labels, and hopefully not even that in 3 years time. For VPLS if you're already doing discovery via BGP, running tLDP is just additional complexity you don't need. LDP clearly scales poorly, BGP is O(1) session to cater n remote PE, LDP is O(n) If you're not doing discovery via BGP, configuration is awkward and complex compared to L3 MPLS VPN. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
