We have the same issue.
Booth on the 3600 and the ASR1001.
From what we gather only some Copper SFPs are working.
GLC-T is a hit miss type of thing.
When using 3rd party SFPs it seems that using ones that dosent support 10/100/1000 but is fixed at 1000 mbit almost always solves the issue. Could it be that the 10/100/1000 portion of the GLC-T isnt supported in SFP+ ports?
Gustav Uhlander
Communication & Infrastructure Engineer
Steria AB
Kungsbron 13
Box 169
SE-101 23 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 622 42 15
Fax: +46 8 622 42 23
Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03
[email protected]
www.steria.se
Gustav Uhlander
Communication & Infrastructure Engineer
Steria AB
Kungsbron 13
Box 169
SE-101 23 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 622 42 15
Fax: +46 8 622 42 23
Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03
[email protected]
www.steria.se
[email protected] skrev: -----
Till: Tóth András <[email protected]>
Från: Lobo
Sänt av: [email protected]
Datum: 2012-12-10 21:30
Kopia: Cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
Ärende: Re: [c-nsp] Copper SFP with ME3600X
Från: Lobo
Sänt av: [email protected]
Datum: 2012-12-10 21:30
Kopia: Cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
Ärende: Re: [c-nsp] Copper SFP with ME3600X
Ahhh interesting. So it looks like the GLC-T is actually NOT supported
on those two SFP ports according to that matrix.
BTW, this switch's client ports are copper 10/100/1000 RJ-45 so no SFP
is required on them. Looks like this particular model number only
supports the fiber based SFPs.
Thanks!
Jose
On 12/10/2012 2:55 PM, Tóth András wrote:
> GLC-T does not seem to be supported in the SFP+ port, only supported
> in the client ports.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.pdf
>
> If you move the SFP to a client port, does it work?
>
> Andras
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Lobo <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Normally I would agree with this command but it's not supported.
> The only "speed" command is nonegotiate and it doesn't make a
> difference when plugging the SFP in.
>
> Jose
>
>
> On 12/10/2012 2:40 PM, Tóth András wrote:
>> Given that this is a 1G in a 10G port, you might need to add
>> "speed 1000" to the interface config?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andras
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Lobo <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone. Been having a hard time trying to get a copper
>> SFP to work on our ME-3600X-24TS-Ms. According to Cisco
>> documentation, the GLC-T SFP is supposed to be supported on
>> one of the fiber ports. However every Cisco SFP we've tried
>> always spits back an error message:
>>
>> Switch#
>>
>> *Dec 6 19:48:30.448: %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in
>> Te0/1 is not supported
>>
>> *Dec 6 19:48:30.448: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error
>> detected on Te0/1, putting Te0/1 in err-disable state
>>
>> Switch#
>>
>>
>> Has anyone had any success with trying to use these on this
>> platform? Fiber based SFPs are fine so long as they're Cisco
>> branded. Are there different versions of GLC-T that we may
>> have the wrong type?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jose
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
on those two SFP ports according to that matrix.
BTW, this switch's client ports are copper 10/100/1000 RJ-45 so no SFP
is required on them. Looks like this particular model number only
supports the fiber based SFPs.
Thanks!
Jose
On 12/10/2012 2:55 PM, Tóth András wrote:
> GLC-T does not seem to be supported in the SFP+ port, only supported
> in the client ports.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.pdf
>
> If you move the SFP to a client port, does it work?
>
> Andras
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Lobo <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Normally I would agree with this command but it's not supported.
> The only "speed" command is nonegotiate and it doesn't make a
> difference when plugging the SFP in.
>
> Jose
>
>
> On 12/10/2012 2:40 PM, Tóth András wrote:
>> Given that this is a 1G in a 10G port, you might need to add
>> "speed 1000" to the interface config?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andras
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Lobo <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone. Been having a hard time trying to get a copper
>> SFP to work on our ME-3600X-24TS-Ms. According to Cisco
>> documentation, the GLC-T SFP is supposed to be supported on
>> one of the fiber ports. However every Cisco SFP we've tried
>> always spits back an error message:
>>
>> Switch#
>>
>> *Dec 6 19:48:30.448: %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in
>> Te0/1 is not supported
>>
>> *Dec 6 19:48:30.448: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error
>> detected on Te0/1, putting Te0/1 in err-disable state
>>
>> Switch#
>>
>>
>> Has anyone had any success with trying to use these on this
>> platform? Fiber based SFPs are fine so long as they're Cisco
>> branded. Are there different versions of GLC-T that we may
>> have the wrong type?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jose
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
