Hello Tin, We are using FP-40 instead of the MSC, and it is working fine with no bad experience at all, we are not affected by its limitations as we did not need the extra features found in the MSC, so i encourage you to go for it if it is sufficient for your needs.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Tin Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I am looking to learn of any good or bad deployment experience with the > new Cisco CRS-1 FP-40 module. Besides the limitations outlined in cisco's > datasheet (less pps and QoS queue than MSC-40), is there any other gotcha's > that you have found in testing or deployment? > > Thank you for sharing your experiences in this matter, > > Tin > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
