Hi, We're in a process of deploying ASR901s as MPLS-enabled 10G CPEs. Depending on your requirements (L2, L3, multicast, etc) you might run into some limitations of the current code (but according to our SE not the platform). We use them for L2 termination. Current code has quite limited QoS implementation when it comes to p2p PWE3 services (only port-based shaping, issues with EXP/QoS bits imposition). ME3600x is far more mature and flexible, but also the price point is much higher.
kind regards Pshem On 25 May 2013 11:55, Brandon Robare <[email protected]> wrote: > ASR901 and ME3600x are both good candidates for this. The ASR is > considerably cheaper, but does not have nearly as many GigE, but this > sounds like it wouldn't be an issue for you. > > > Brandon > > > > On 5/24/13 3:07 AM, "Thomas Braun" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi Group, >> >>I need some suggestions for 10G cpes, 2 * 10G interfaces. >> >>How are your experiences there and what do you use? >> >>Thanks for your answers. >> >> >>Regards >>thomas >>_______________________________________________ >>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
