Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings. On May 27, 2013, at 8:36, Adam Vitkovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Folks, > Has anyone encountered ISIS/CLNS MTU issues between ASR1k and ASR9k please? > > sh isis int / sh clns int > - shows MTU: 9177 on both ends. > > debug isis adj-packets / debug isis adj det > - shows that both routers are sending IIHs with Length 9177 -though they do > not receive any IIHs from each other. > > Only after I have instructed both routers to never pad IIHs (no to check > mtu) the adjacency came up. > So they clearly have problems with CLNS MTU. > > A1k XE 15.3(1)S1 > interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2 > mtu 9180 > > A9k XR 4.2.3 > interface Bundle-Ether201.3206 > mtu 9198 What's the full config on the Bundle interface, given the subinterface on thr 9k (and none on 1k) I'm guessing there's some layer 2 transport involved here? Are you sure that accommodates your MTU? _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
