In this case, the BGP never came up at all. I never received an ACK from the initial SYN, so the BGP session never was established at all. The other side was a JunOS box, so I don't know the details.
On 7/5/13 1:59 PM, "Nick Hilliard" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 05/07/2013 18:13, Chuck Church wrote: >> Yeah, that actually seems worse than dropping all traffic. I suppose >>your >> CoPP rules could group 'unknown BGP' into its own class, rather than >>falling >> into class default. Seeing the drops in the unknown BGP section might >>be a >> little more obvious than the class default drops. > >s/your/their/, but otherwise yes, that would be sensible. > >Nick > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
