ASR 9000 has video monitoring capabilites built in. No need to use additional 
gear in most of the scenarios.

-- 
./

Dnia 17 lip 2013 o godz. 19:06 Thong Hawk Yen <hawk.yen.th...@time.com.my> 
napisał(a):

> Hi,
> 
> Our version is video verifier which is specially design for IPTV.  I am not 
> sure if they have a version that do non-video multicast.
> You might want to have a look at their range of  product at their homepage at 
>  http://www.exfo.com/
> 
> Regards
> Amos Thong
> 
> ________________________________
> From: dim0sal [mailto:dim0...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:53 PM
> To: Thong Hawk Yen; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: R: RE: [c-nsp] multicast issue
> 
> Hi
> Is brixvision suitable also for not iptv mcast flows?
> We run financial market mcast flows. ..
> 
> Tks
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Mobile
> 
> 
> -------- Messaggio originale --------
> Da: Thong Hawk Yen <hawk.yen.th...@time.com.my>
> Data:
> A: R S <dim0...@hotmail.com>,cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Oggetto: RE: [c-nsp] multicast issue
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We run a BGP NG-MVPN for IPTV content delivery, with Juniper MX480 in the PE 
> layer and Cisco CRS in the P layer. With RSVP-TE P2MP LSP running from the 
> Sender PE ( which is connecting to the multicast upstream HE router ) to the 
> Receiver PE routers ( with downstream GPON IPTV subscribers ).
> 
> We have BrixVision IPTV probes at the Sender PE router before the traffic 
> enter our MPLS cloud and the same type of probes at Receiver PE routers.
> So far there is no need for IPTV probes along the RSVP-TE P2MP LSP path. This 
> will help to determine the traffic quality in the IP/MPLS core.
> 
> At the downstream we have STB probe aka Single Channel Probe from the same 
> brand deployed at the customer's place if there is a picture quality 
> complaint. This will help us to determine issue from receiver PE router 
> through the GPON networks towards the customer home.
> 
> We had evaluated Ineoquest before, however we found Brixvision was more 
> suitable to our environment.
> 
> In the early stage of deployment we kept our eye on the IAT and MLR on the 
> probe almost everyday. The Brixvision has very detail real time zoomed-in 
> analysis like TS Sync, PAT, CRC and etc per group.
> 
> Hope this help.
> 
> Regards
> Amos Thong
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of R S
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:53 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] multicast issue
> 
> Hi all
> 
> Just a brainstorming and your possible help.
> 
> 
> I manage a network where multicast is the most important traffic and
> sometimes I get issue by customer where they state that some packets are 
> lost...
> 
> 
> Does anybody have an idea or can help me in understanding a possible
> solution in monitoring traffic in real time manner, maybe with the use of some
> software or appliance or whatelse.
> 
> In my idea I could monitor traffic on the source and on the destination,
> then with  a sort of parsing understand
> if it's my network loosing the packets or not...
> 
> 
> 
> Any idea ? suggestion ?
> 
> 
> tks
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY
> -------------------------
> The contents of and any attachments to this email are private and 
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or addressee indicated in 
> this message, please notify the sender of the error and destroy the email and 
> any attachments. Please do not reproduce the contents of the email or its 
> attachments as such reproduction is a breach of confidentiality and for which 
> legal action including injunctive relief may be sought against you. If it is 
> your company policy that official communications are not by email, please 
> advise immediately. Any opinions, conclusions and other information in this 
> message that do not relate to the official business of TIME dotCom shall be 
> understood as neither given nor endorsed by TIME dotCom, nor shall TIME 
> dotCom shall be liable (directly or vicariously) for such opinions, 
> statements or communications.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY
> -------------------------
> The contents of and any attachments to this email are private and 
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or addressee indicated in 
> this message, please notify the sender of the error and destroy the email and 
> any attachments. Please do not reproduce the contents of the email or its 
> attachments as such reproduction is a breach of confidentiality and for which 
> legal action including injunctive relief may be sought against you. If it is 
> your company policy that official communications are not by email, please 
> advise immediately. Any opinions, conclusions and other information in this 
> message that do not relate to the official business of TIME dotCom shall be 
> understood as neither given nor endorsed by TIME dotCom, nor shall TIME 
> dotCom shall be liable (directly or vicariously) for such opinions, 
> statements or communications.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to