Hi, On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:34:40PM -0700, quinn snyder wrote: > i think you'll being to see futher enhancements to the platforms > (c6k, nexus) that will start to draw clear lines between the > positioning or 'general use case'. catalyst will continue to be > the campus platform, while nexus will be for the d/c.
And *that* very much shows how much lack of understanding there is in
product development. There is not so much difference between "campus",
"d/c" and "service provider" anymore - and the arbitrary product
differenciation ("no, you can't have *that* feature which would make
perfect sense to you, because that's only available on the other boxes
[which, incidentially, lack 5 features that you need]") is really
alienating customers.
Join forces, build a sane product with a sane OS (which is not "classic
monolithic IOS" and not "classic monolithic IOS on top of linux" either),
and use all the development resources for that, instead of splitting
sparse resources on building 3-5 competing platforms, each of them lacking
something important the others already have.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpePrAhOY8Ld.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
