Thanks Darren, very helpful!
On 27.07.2013 17:52, Darren O'Connor wrote: > Yes. > > In your first config you are enabling ospf under the interface, under the > process, and you're also redistributing that same interface subnet under ospf > by using redistribute connected. You don't need both the interface config and > the process config. It doesn't break anything using both, but it makes it > difficult for others to troubleshoot later. If you did use both, the most > specific will 'win' > > And yes, while your release is 'new', the train itself is old. Check here: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_ospf/command/ospf-a1.html#wp1148191700 > > It shows which releases have this command enabled and when. The SX train is > not on that list > > Thanks > > Darren > > http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ > > On 27 Jul 2013, at 16:41, "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> older release? Just take a look, 12.2(33) was compiled in April 2012. >> Until now I've had no problems to enable OSPF on the interface _and_ in >> router ospf section of the config. (12.4 and 12.5 train for VXR chassis) >> >> >> Do you mean this config is enough: >> >> ! >> router ospf 12345 >> router-id 192.168.100.232 >> redistribute connected subnets >> redistribute static >> passive-interface default >> no passive-interface Vlan50 >> network 192.168.100.0 0.0.15.255 area 0 >> ! >> ipv6 router ospf 12345 >> router-id 192.168.100.232 >> log-adjacency-changes >> passive-interface default >> no passive-interface Vlan50 >> redistribute connected >> ! >> ... >> ... >> ! >> interface Vlan50 >> ip address 192.168.100.197 255.255.255.252 >> no ip redirects >> no ip proxy-arp >> ipv6 address x:x:x:x::y/126 >> ipv6 nd ra suppress >> ! >> >> Without enabling OSPF on interface side? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert >> >> >> >> >> On 27.07.2013 17:25, Darren O'Connor wrote: >>> The interface-level ospf command was not available in older releases. >>> >>> A bit odd to enable OSPf on an interface under both router ospf and the >>> interface itself. I would stick to just one or the other >>> >>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 15:43:52 +0200 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [c-nsp] OSPF question >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm a little bit confused while configuring a CAT6509 switch with OSPF. >>>> So far, I used on the c7206-VXR platform the following config: >>>> >>>> ! >>>> router ospf 12345 >>>> router-id 192.168.100.232 >>>> redistribute connected subnets >>>> redistribute static >>>> passive-interface default >>>> no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.50 >>>> network 192.168.100.0 0.0.15.255 area 0 >>>> ! >>>> ... >>>> ... >>>> ! >>>> interface GigabitEthernet0/1.50 >>>> encapsulation dot1Q 556 >>>> ip address 192.168.100.197 255.255.255.252 >>>> no ip redirects >>>> no ip proxy-arp >>>> ip ospf 12345 area 0 >>>> ipv6 address 2001:5DD:50::1/126 >>>> ipv6 nd ra suppress >>>> ipv6 ospf 12345 area 0 >>>> ! >>>> >>>> Now, with IOS "s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXJ3" the statement >>>> "ip ospf <process-ID> area 0" is missing. >>>> >>>> ! >>>> interface GigabitEthernet4/21 >>>> switchport >>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>>> switchport mode trunk >>>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 50 >>>> no cdp enable >>>> ! >>>> ... >>>> ... >>>> ! >>>> interface Vlan50 >>>> ip address 192.168.100.197 255.255.255.252 >>>> no ip redirects >>>> no ip proxy-arp >>>> ipv6 address x:x:x:x::y/126 >>>> ipv6 nd ra suppress >>>> ipv6 ospf 12345 area 0 >>>> ! >>>> >>>> The "ip ospf area 0" command is unrecognized :-( Any ideas? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Robert >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
