2013-08-22 10:36 skrev Chris Russell:
>> you missing any features compared to ME devices? Has VPLS been running well or have you had any issues? The ME is a great little device.. and from my limited exposure to them "just works". Agree with you on the 10G ports. Brocades' addition of 4x10G to the CER-RT may push Cisco into looking at this again though. One of the limitations we've found within VPLS on the C6K w/sup-2T is there are problems with l2 tunnelling of untagged packets - specifically STP/VTP/CDP. We were recommended the ASR (1K) instead of the C6K due to this but currently it`s looking like they have the same issue. The same config on an ME just works. Both of the above currently raised with Cisco engineering teams Chris Thanks Chris! I agree the platform has really matured into something good and I really like the QoS features and buffers. I also heard that tunneling of BPDUs is troublesome on Cat 6500 which might be an issue. Thanks for the input! Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
